Florida A&M
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,891  Simone Durden SO 22:30
2,144  Chandelic Jackson JR 22:48
2,571  Effiey Kosgei FR 23:21
2,729  Zenia George JR 23:33
2,771  Clarricia Golden JR 23:37
2,987  Ciera Williams SO 23:58
3,253  Ariel Allen JR 24:38
3,494  Cynthia Chelelgo FR 25:29
National Rank #268 of 339
South Region Rank #31 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Simone Durden Chandelic Jackson Effiey Kosgei Zenia George Clarricia Golden Ciera Williams Ariel Allen Cynthia Chelelgo
FSU Invitational 10/05 1364 22:30 22:33 25:15 23:40 23:19 23:52 26:19 25:56
UCF Black and Gold 10/12 1384 22:23 22:36 24:24 23:30 24:14 23:46 24:44
MEAC Championships 10/27 1389 22:48 23:29 23:32 23:32 23:23 24:31 24:37 25:10
South Region Championships 11/09 1354 22:27 22:53 22:52 23:32 23:47 24:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 32.3 921 0.0 0.1 1.3 4.8 12.6 18.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Simone Durden 146.6
Chandelic Jackson 166.1
Effiey Kosgei 194.4
Zenia George 204.8
Clarricia Golden 207.6
Ciera Williams 225.1
Ariel Allen 252.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 1.3% 1.3 28
29 4.8% 4.8 29
30 12.6% 12.6 30
31 18.3% 18.3 31
32 18.1% 18.1 32
33 16.9% 16.9 33
34 12.3% 12.3 34
35 8.0% 8.0 35
36 5.3% 5.3 36
37 1.7% 1.7 37
38 0.5% 0.5 38
39 0.0% 0.0 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0